George Olshevskey wrote:
>In a message dated 8/4/01 4:28:54 PM EST,
>species of Triceratops are there. This is what I have figured
out. >>>
> >What's wrong with Ostrom & Wellnhofer's Triceratops taxonomy? Or Cathy >Forster's? I am not saying that there is anything wrong with Ostrom & Wellnhofer's
or Cathy Forster's taxonomies. I was wondering what I would come up
with since both are kind of different and "Species of Triceratops" is the
result. By the way, I reverted from "Eurycephale" [unpublished] back to
"Eurycephalia" [unpublished].
|