[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148

To: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Subject: Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009061940450.46764-100000@dinosaur.umbc.edu>
Reply-to: tmk@dinosauricon.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, T. Mike Keesey wrote:

> > [B] Tracy Ford's article 23 describes the stegopeltine ankylosaurid
> > Glyptodontopelta mimus gen. et sp. nov.
> 
> Stegopeltine? Do you mean "sauropeltine nodosaurid"?

Oh, wait, there *is* a _Stegopelta_ ... ha ha ... but I thought it had
been synonymized with _Nodosaurus_.

_____________________________________________________________________________
T. Michael Keesey.........<tmk@dinosauricon.com>.........<keesey@bigfoot.com>
AIM <Ric Blayze>..............ICQ <77314901>...........Yahoo!M <Mighty Odinn>
Home Page (includes The Dinosauricon)........<http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>

References:
- Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
  - From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tmk@dinosauricon.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
Next by Date: Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
Next by thread: Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #148
Indexes: