[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"

To: <rob_redwing@hotmail.com>, <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"
From: "Patrick Norton" <ptnorton@email.msn.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:44:19 -0400
Reply-to: ptnorton@email.msn.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

>Vultures aren't exactly the most aerodynamic of birds to begin with.<

*Groan*

PTN

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: mammal definition (was "Fossil Discovery Threatens")
Next by Date: Re: *Longisquama* and Fossil "Ghost" Lineages -- Rehashing an Old Debate
Previous by thread: Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"
Next by thread: Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"
Indexes: