[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dilophosaurus and Syntarsus
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Rob Gay wrote:
> It also states that Dilophosaurus, Syntarsus et al.
> are part of Ceratosauria, along with Ceratosaurus. It seems to me, from what
> I've been able to get from the section, that there are not a whole lot of
> similarities between Ceratosaurus and the rest of the group, beyond the fact
> the it has horns, and some of the other "Ceratosaurs". Just wondering if
> these animals were still grouped together, or has cladistics tackled this
Cladistic studies have so far upheld the group, which contains two
divisions: Coelophysoidea and Neoceratosauria. _Ceratosaurus_ certainly
shares features with other Neoceratosauria (such as Abelisauria), such as
6 or 7 fused sacral vertebrae and tall, robust skull. I've heard that the
link between Coelophysoidea and Neoceratosauria might be weaker,
though; possibly based on primitive characters. I've seen the following
scheme, but am not sure if it has been published:
--+--Coelophysoidea
`--+--Neoceratosauria
`--Tetanurae
____________________________________________________________________________
T. Michael Keesey <tmk@dinosauricon.com> | AIM <Ric Blayze> | ICQ <77314901>
My Worlds <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>