Re: "Feathery fossil shows birds aren't dinosaurs"

[bh162@scn.org (Phillip Bigelow)]

Is this another better preserved specimen of Longisquama that
preserves good morphology, or is this specimen the same old
hash-on-a-slab holotype that will undoubtably evoke comments
like "It has a furcula!"  "No it doesn't!"  "Yes it does!"

In other words, is this paper in _Science_ an example of
rehashing old hash?

Curious minds and all that....
                <pb>



--
"Gentlemen!  You can't fight in here!  This is the War Room!"
(from Dr. Strangelove)