[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sharovipteryx II

To: dinogami@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Sharovipteryx II
From: dbensen <dbensen@gotnet.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 16:32:32 -0700
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <20000608225608.80328.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: dbensen@gotnet.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

>> Thus, we don't _need_ Liaoning
pterosaur fossils to tell us this <<
The "this" that I was referring to was whether _all_ pterosaurs had fur or just
some groups of them.  Your confusion is understandable as I could have made that
question clearer.

>> But we already _do_ have Liaoning pterosaurs: at least 2
pterodactyloid specimens.<<
Really?  Cool.

, but anyway, about Sharobipteryx. . .

Dan

References:
- Re: Sharovipteryx II
  - From: "Jerry D. Harris" <dinogami@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: bauplan convergence
Next by Date: Re: bauplan convergence
Previous by thread: Re: Sharovipteryx II
Next by thread: Re: Sharovipteryx II
Indexes: