We also state that people like Feduccia and Martin rarely, if ever, present
an explicit set of relationships. We couldn't include specific phylogenies
from them because there aren't any, with rare exceptions (e.g. the trees in
Whetstone and Wybrow or in Hecht and Tarsitano). This is a problem
one the other side of the "debate" (such as it is) has to resolve - if you
think placing birds somewhere other than Dinosauria improves stratigraphic
congruence, let's see the tree; don't just tell us that birds are related
to some sort of thecodont or crocodylomorph. We simulated their ideas by
pruning birds from Dinosauria and drawing them closer to one of the other
postulated bird relatives. I'm sure Martin and others will object to these
trees, but if they don't give us an alternative, we have no choice.
chris
----------------------
Christopher A. Brochu
Department of Geology
Field Museum of Natural History
1400 S. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60605
voice: 312-665-7633
fax: 312-665-7641
electronic: cbrochu@fmppr.fmnh.org