Re: Bruhathkayosaurus

[Dinochandler@aol.com]

Steve,
I believe it is now considered to be more likely a sauropod than a theropod 
(if it's even a dinosaur at all).
The ilium and ischium (parts of the hip), tibia (lower leg), radius 
(forearm), and centrum were discovered (there may be others that I'm not 
aware of).

Chandler



In a message dated 6/2/00 10:58:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
dinoland@mailcity.com writes:

<< Hey all,
 What's the current status of Bruhathkayosaurus, the Late Cretaceous Indian 
theropod which was inititally reconstructed at lengths of up to 65 feet when 
first discovered in 1989!!???
 
 Any current research on this guy?  I recall that only part of the hip and 
part of the lower leg (possibly the fibula) were found.  Any more material??
 
 Steve >>