[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida

To: tmk@dinosaur.umbc.edu
Subject: Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
From: Stanley Friesen <sarima@friesen.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 09:56:48 -0800
Cc: NJPharris@aol.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001241649490.40429-100000@dinosaur.umbc.edu >
References: <6f.47093c.25be21d3@aol.com>
Reply-to: sarima@friesen.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

At 04:52 PM 1/24/00 -0500, Mike Keesey wrote:
>
>But if the type species of a genus is a junior synonym, the genus can't be
>valid. 

Why not?  This just results in the senior synonym being the type species.

--------------
May the peace of God be with you.         sarima@ix.netcom.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
  - From: Mike Keesey <tmk@dinosaur.umbc.edu>

References:
- Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
  - From: NJPharris@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
Next by Date: R: Tiny Dinosaurs
Previous by thread: Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
Next by thread: Re: Old Dubia vs. New Valida
Indexes: