Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #133

[AM Yates <Adam.Yates@bristol.ac.uk>]

> Lewisuchus Romer, 1972*
> 
> The asterisk denotes it as presently considered to be non-dinosaurian. Just 
> what kind of non-dinosaurian archosaur it is remains unclear, as far as I 
> know.
> 
It may enjoy Dinosaur(iform) status once again. In the entry on
Dinosauromorpha in the Encyclopaedia of Dinosaurs, Arcucci suggests that
Lewisuchus might be a dinosauriform and might even be the senior synonym
of Pseudolagosuchus major. Apparently this is work in progress, I look
forward to the paper.

cheers

Adam Yates