[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
PYGOSTYLES & PENGUINS
Thanks to a printing problem we are afflicted with here at the
university, I have a bit of spare time and would like to regurgitate
a random thought I had the other day.. well, not that random
actually.
I read a lot about penguins. As some of you may know, I was actually
supposed to be doing my phd on this group, and in fact Stig Walsh and
I still intend to write up the several new taxa represented at the
Pliocene Chilean bonebed Stig has been working on. To get to the
point, it was argued by Lowe and some other authors in the 1930s that
penguins were not secondarily flightless, but had actually evolved
from non-volant ancestors. Similar arguments were advocated for
palaeognaths. Simpson and all subsequent workers, however, showed
that the evidence for this was weak and the structure of the penguin
cerebellum, their courtship rituals, habitual postures and several
other features indicated descent from flying ancestors analogous with
extant diving petrels (pelecanoidids). Of interest here is that one
of the primary pieces of evidence used for descent of penguins
from volant ancestors was the presence of a pygostyle, as penguins
clearly have this structure. It was argued that only volant birds
have evolved a pygostyle, and that penguins have it must therefore
mean that they, or their ancestors, once flew. De Beer, in a paper
evaluating the descent of ratites from volant or non-volant
ancestors, also cited the pygostyle as a flight feature retained
vestigially as a 'heritage marker' in some extant ratites.
By no means am I saying that either case (the evolution of penguins
or ratites from volant ancestors) is now made less secure by the
discovery of an apparent pygostyle in a non-avian theropod. Nor am I
saying that, now that at least one oviraptorosaur has an apparent
pygostyle then all oviraptorosaurs must also descent from volant
pygostyle-bearing ancestors. I am just pointing out some
inconsistency in argumentation, though I have no real point to make
here and have no interesting conclusion to draw.
Well, back to work.
DARREN NAISH
PALAEOBIOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP
School of Earth, Environmental & Physical Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH
Burnaby Building
Burnaby Road email: darren.naish@port.ac.uk
Portsmouth UK tel: 01703 446718
P01 3QL [COMING SOON:
http://www.naish-zoology.com]