From: archosaur@usa.net
Reply-To: archosaur@usa.net
To: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
CC: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: [Errors and misunderstandings (was RE: Air sacs in extant
non-avian reptiles?)]
Date: 31 Jul 00 20:41:51 EDT
"Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu> wrote:
> I) Phylogenetic-based classifications are supported by many biologists:
> neontologists and paleontologists alike. These include botanists,
> mammalogists, lizard workers, ichthyologists, entomologists, >
malacologists, and others who have no particular interest in Dinosauria.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Aw that's not very fair. How come all the other sciences get a formal name?
Why is it just "lizard workers?" Last I checked, herpetology was a valid
scientific field.
Sorry for getting all nit picky, but I do so hate it when the rest of the
reptilia get brushed into a corner in order to make room for their larger
archosaurian cousins.
Jura
Jurassosaurus's Reptipage: A page devoted to the study of the reptilia:
http://reptilis.webjump.com
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1