[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Big Craters
Message text written by "James R. Cunningham"
>From another source (Jerry, I don't have the reference in front of me --
will
fish it out for you -- turn about is fair play, and you are playing fair).
Crater sizes
Name Age Dia. (km)
Chicxulub 64.98 Myr 170
Morokweng 145 70
Vredefort 2023 300
This source estimates Morokweng at 100 km smaller than Chicxulub. Still
other sources place Chicxulub at =>300. I think its only fair to note
that
many estimated crater sizes are awfully tenuous.<
I'll have to check that reference -- thanks for posting it! I
agree that crater size determination can have a significant margin of
error, particularly when the crater is subsurface (as in Morokweng and
parts of Chixilub). Unless we can actually drag a tape across the edges of
a visibile crater (as in Meteor Crater in AZ), we have to rely on more
indirect evidence (seismic, gravity anomaly, etc.), and since large craters
can have numerous ringed structures, determining which are actual crater
edges and which are rebound, collapse, etc. structures. In addition to
Morokweng, I recall that there was some debate about Chixilub's size as
well -- someone had interpreted some seismic data as an outer ring that was
the "real" size of the crater, making it almost twice as large as current
estimates. As with numerous things in paleontology, it appears that
geophysicists have to wait for a consensus to be reached as well!
_,_
____/_\,) .. _
--____-===( _\/ \\/ \-----_---__
/\ ' ^__/>/\____\--------
__________/__\_ ____________________________.//__.//_________
Jerry D. Harris
Fossil Preparation Lab
New Mexico Museum of Natural History
1801 Mountain Rd NW
Albuquerque NM 87104-1375
Phone: (505) 841-2809
Fax: ; (505) 841-2808
LOKICORP@compuserve.com