[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Giant birds (again) part 2

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Giant birds (again) part 2
From: "Martin Barnett" <martin.barnett3@virgin.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 21:24:48 -0800
Reply-to: martin.barnett3@virgin.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Sorry about the half-message, technical error I think:

> In addition to these points (could've sworn I already sent this message -
oh
> well), the material identified as Dynamosaurus imperiosus which was
later...
>
assigned to Tyrannosaurus rex was found if I remember rightly with scutes.
How do proponents of the feathered baby T-rex theory account for this?  Is
it possible to be a fuzzy chick one mnute and an armoured adult the next?

Samuel Barnett

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: walking with dinosaurs]
Next by Date: RE: Museums: the ultimate databases (was RE: Unified cladistics, et al.)
Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: walking with dinosaurs]
Next by thread: Re: Giant birds (again) part 2
Indexes: