RE: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #118

["T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>]

On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Stanley Friesen wrote:

> At 08:24 AM 11/12/99 -0500, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
> >No, it is not a macronarian, at least according to the paper.  It still
> >falls out as the sister taxon to Neosauropoda.
> 
> I am finding myself confused by all the subclades of Sauropoda.
> 
> Could somebody send out a summary of all the clade definitions,
> or a broad overview of the sauropod phylogeny with clade names?

http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/taxa/sauropoda.html

--T. Michael Keesey
tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM:  Ric Blayze | WORLDS:    http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/