[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New taxon (and taxonomy) from Sereno's Science paper
At 08:32 PM 6/25/99 -0400, T. Mike Keesey wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Sereno also provides new redefinitions for:
>> Ornithomimidae (all ornithomimosaurs closer to _Ornithomimus_ than to
>> _Shuvuuia_);
>AAAAAAAAH!!!
Yeah, I know...
>> Ornithomimoidea (_Shuvuuia_, _Ornithomimus_, their most recent common
>> ancestor, and all descendants);
>AAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!
Yeah, I know...
>> Alvarezsauridae (all ornithomimosaurs closer to _Shuvuuia_ than to
>> _Ornithomimus_);
>AAAAAAAHHHH!!!
Yeah, I know...
>> Therizinosauridae (all maniraptoriforms closer to _Erlikosaurus_ than to
>> _Ornithomimus_, _Oviraptor_, or Neornithes [not fond of more than two anchor
>> taxa, but this one kinda works for me, in that it covers most of the
bases...]);
>Did The Complete Dinosaur already define this as
>{_Therizinosaurus_ > _Alxasaurus_}?
Don't think so: they simply reiterate Russell & Dong's two families: the
monotypic Alxasauridae, and the everything else Therizinosauridae. No
phylogenetic definitions for either.
>> and Oviraptoroidea (_Oviraptor_, _Caenagnathus_, their most recent common
>> ancestor, and all descendants).
>Ah, a good one at last! Except this is already Oviraptorosauria, isn't it?
Yeah.
>Are any of the AAAAAAAAH!!!! definitions preceded by another definition?
>I always thought of them as:
>Ornithomimidae: {_Ornithomimus_ > _Garudimimus_}
>Ornithomimoidea: {_Ornithomimus_ > _Harpymimus_, _Pelecanimimus_}
>Alvarezsauridae: {_Alvarezsaurus_ + _Parvicursor_ (or any other
>parvicursorine)}
Not bad definitions, but none were in the literature yet (to my knowledge).
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Deptartment of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
Webpage: http://www.geol.umd.edu Phone:301-405-4084
Email:tholtz@geol.umd.edu Fax: 301-314-9661