[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
From: Larry Cunningham <lcunning@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:23:55 -0400
Cc: cbrochu@fmppr.fmnh.org
In-reply-to: <378F3E63.4DC9@fmppr.fmnh.org>
References: <d813340d.24c078a8@aol.com>
Reply-to: lcunning@columbus.rr.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Hamster Dance has moved; try:

http://members.xoom.com/_hamster_/

For a (sorta) related site, check out:

http://www.newgrounds.com/assassin/hamster/

Don't say I didn't warn you :-).

--Larry

References:
- Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
  - From: Philidor11@aol.com
- Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
  - From: chris brochu <cbrochu@fmppr.fmnh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
Next by Date: Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
Previous by thread: Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
Next by thread: Re: Underlying basis of classification (Was: Re Dinobirds)
Indexes: