[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: new titanosaur paper

To: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <th81@umail.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: new titanosaur paper
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <199907091726.NAA29699@umailsrv0.umd.edu>
Reply-to: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:

> They even suggest that titanosaurs (or at least the derived saltasaurids)

I've never heard of a Saltasauridae -- thought _S._ was a titanosaurid?

--T. Michael Keesey
tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM:   RicBlayze | WORLDS:    http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/

References:
- new titanosaur paper
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <th81@umail.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: CNN: Giant Dinosaur-Age Bones in Antarctica Clue to Warmer Climate
Next by Date: Velociraptor paper
Previous by thread: new titanosaur paper
Next by thread: William E. Scheele
Indexes: