[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Ricardoestia or Richardestia?

To: paleo_mont@excite.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Ricardoestia or Richardestia?
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 03:10:33 EST
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 1/7/99 3:00:52 AM EST, paleo_mont@excite.com writes:

<< Hopefully the teeth are all paratypes of the
 original specimen and not considered the same animal....am I correct on that
 part? >>

Holotype is the slender pair of dentaries with teeth (NMC 343 at National
Museum of Canada -- Canadian Museum of Nature). Isolated teeth are all
referred specimens.

Prev by Date: Re: Ricardoestia or Richardestia?
Next by Date: Re: Yumping On The Debased Saurian Bandwagon
Previous by thread: Re: Ricardoestia or Richardestia?
Next by thread: Re: Ricardoestia or Richardestia?
Indexes: