[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
TURTLES AS DIAPSIDS
I've been out for a bit so whoever I owe an email to I WILL get
back...
Anyway, there has been a lot of stuff recently in the litt. about
turtles being diapsids. Olivier Rieppel has been arguing this very
strongly recently with papers by himself (in Analysis of Complex
Systems- Zoological, JVP, etc. 1994) and with Michael deBraga (in ZJLS
and Nature). According to Rieppel, and I agree, turtles are diapsids
allied with lepidosauromorphs and are probably a sister-group to
Sauropterygia (Chris Brochu, who works with Rieppel at the FMNH, can
probably fill in the details if he so wishes). This contrasts to the
traditional views that turtles are parareptiles and/or anapsids. Laurin
and Reisz (Tree of Life among other places) argue that turtles are
derived procolophonids while Michael Lee (the author of the now famous
snake-mosasaur stuff) argues that they are paierasaurs. I don't really
buy either one. As Rieppel points out, diapsids share many of the
characters outlined by Laurin and Reisz and Lee. Turtles also share
some developmental patterns with lepidosauromorph diapsids.
Matt Troutman
m_troutman@hotmail.com
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com