[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Serenogram

To: th81@umail.umd.edu, tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu
Subject: Re: Serenogram
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 01:44:33 EST
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 2/8/99 5:20:11 PM EST, th81@umail.umd.edu writes:

<< Damn good question...  By publication date of *name*, Avetheropoda is older
 by years.  By publication date of usage in a fully cladistic context,
 Avetheropoda is older by weeks.  By publication date of explicit definition,
 though, Sereno beat out the as-yet-still-in-press Padian et al. paper
 mentioned above. >>

Ahhh! "Phyletic definition wars." Think I'll sit this one out on the
sidelines. See why priority of publication of name makes most sense?

Prev by Date: RE: Follow-up on Lions of Savuti
Next by Date: Re: Follow-up on Lions of Savuti
Previous by thread: Re: Serenogram
Next by thread: Re: Serenogram
Indexes: