[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Minmi

On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Pharris Nicholas J wrote:

> OK, so I misspoke.  More precisely, what I meant was that I think _Minmi_
> is distinct enough that it does not belong in any other ankylosaur family
> and that it should not be shoehorned into the Nodosauridae, as is common
> practice.

That isn't the common practice anymore, now that phylogenetic taxonomy is
more popular: see
http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/dinosaur/taxa/ankylosa.htm

--T. Mike Keesey                                   <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
THE DINOSAURICON                http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/dinosaur