[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: A book by its cover

To: Patrick.Norton@state.me.us
Subject: Re: A book by its cover
From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 07:42:09 -0700
Cc: "dinosaur list (comment line) (IPM Return requested)" <dinosaur@usc.edu>, "jwoolf@erinet.com (IPM Return requested)" <jwoolf@erinet.com>
References: <"024C635EE995F321*/c=us/admd= /prmd=Mainegovt/o=msmail/s=Norton/g=Patrick/"@MHS>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Molds are reversed.  Is it possible that it is a photo of the mold?

Norton, Patrick wrote:

> Jonathan Woolf wrote:
>
> <According to the back flap, the photograph is of a cast of the Berlin
> specimen, not the actual specimen itself.  Could this explain the
> reversal?>
>
> No. Casts are duplicates of the original. This reversal is a photographic
> effect, for whatever reason.

Prev by Date: A book by its cover
Next by Date: Re: A book by its cover
Previous by thread: A book by its cover
Next by thread: Re: A book by its cover
Indexes: