Re: GSP's hadrosaurian reconstructions

[tlford@ix.netcom.com]

James R. Cunningham wrote:
> 
> tlford@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >Triceratops Flabellatus that
> 
> > EVERYONE uses (Paleontologist and laymen alike) (Marsh's line drawing or
> > the really nice plate) is TOTALLY WRONG!!! Lull wrote a short paper in
> > 1934 (a year after his 1933 monograph) and corrected this and no one
> > uses it!!! THat is why I had George specifically use both the wrong and
> > right line drawing in his Gakken Mook Ceratopain article and I put it in
> > my PT article. Does anyone use the right drawing? NO!!!
> 
> Tracy,
> Where can I find these two articles?

The Gakken Mook is hard to get. It's in Japanese and the sereis isn't
being published anymore. (To bad, it was the best gig I had going, and
for George also).

The Lull paper is easier;

Lull, R. S. 1934. Skull of Triceratops flabellatus recently mounted at
Yale. Amer. Jour. Sci. [5] Vol. 28: 439-442.


Tracy