[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: BIRDY _ARCHAEOPTERYX_
John V Jackson wrote:
> >
> ><<...just like the opposing theory! No-one has evidence for *any* J
> >precursor to Archae apart from a few unusually small teeth which could
> >be anything. Apart from cladistics and historical accident, there is no
> >evidence that the direction of relationship is _Velociraptor_ -> Archae;
> >and time would seem to point the arrow the other way.>>
> >
> >"Could be anything"! I think that the teeth are described as
> >maniraptoriform in character. Padian also described some Morrison
> >maniraptorans or maniraptoriforms.
>
Yeah, 'cause we have any sort of a handle on the variation within
"maniraptoriform" dentition...
> >3) Unserrated, triangular, crocodilian-like teeth.
>
> How many insectivores are known with serrated teeth? Only flesh-rippers
> need them (and not all of them: mammals slice, crocs swallow whole or use
> their short necks to twist or just "flip" the prey in two. [Cor did you see
> that program the other day where the croc had a pig in its mouth and just
> flicked its head and the back half of the pig just vanished in the space of
> a couple of frames?!! But I digress]).
>
What about the frutivorous varanid with dentition that is
virtually identical to the carnivorous forms? Complete with denticles...
--
__________________________
Josh Smith
University of Pennsylvania
Department of Earth and Environmental Science
471 Hayden Hall
240 South 33rd Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316
(215) 898-5630 (Office)
(215) 898-0964 (FAX)
smithjb@sas.upenn.edu