[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: EVOLUTION OF BIRD
Message text written by INTERNET:smithjb@sas.upenn.edu
>>It may be parsimonious out west, but it is not necessarilly that
way here in the east. The Newark Supergroup has not produced much in the
way of theropods, and has never produced a single theropod pedal element
to my knowledge. Even in the prosauropods we get from the Newark, there
is a distinct lack of pedal data. Most of the work that I have done,
with Jim Farlow and Paul Olsen, on this subject, by necessity used pedal
data from outside of the Newark Supergroup because they are simply absent
from within. This work seems to suggest theropod trackmakers for most
of the ichnotaxa examined more strongly than non-theropods, but strongly
enough for me to want to base anything on it. The work is still in
progress in many respects, and I would have to say inconclusive. And
almost nothing has been done in the Newark on anything that someone might
want to call avian.<<
Josh is, of course, correct...I should've been a bit clearer with
my wording (apologies for any confusion). All I meant was that since we
_do_ know that Late Triassic and Early Jurassic theropods existed (at that
time, if not in the specific formations in question), but do not know of
any avian or non-theropod, avian-like foot fossils (again, from any
formation, anywhere), the attribution of the prints to the Theropoda is
parsimonious. Of course, new body fossil data could easily change this!
8-D
_,_
____/_\,) .. _
--____-===( _\/ \\/ \-----_---__
/\ ' ^__/>/\____\--------
__________/__\_ ____________________________.//__.//_________
Jerry D. Harris
Fossil Preparation Lab
New Mexico Museum of Natural History
1801 Mountain Rd NW
Albuquerque NM 87104-1375
Phone: (505) 899-2809
Fax: (505) 841-2866
102354.2222@compuserve.com