[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: WHAT I SAW TODAY AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

To: GSP1954@aol.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: WHAT I SAW TODAY AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 02:06:51 EDT
Cc: Leahyg%amds.EDW@mhs.elan.af.mil
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 98-06-24 00:00:23 EDT, GSP1954@aol.com writes:

<< However, I suspect these are secondarily flightless dinosaurs closer to
birds
 than the urvogel. >>

Agree absolutely. Funny that the article, as published at the Nature web site,
doesn't even >mention< the possibility of secondary flightlessness. As far as
the article goes, these are animals that have >not yet< attained the ability
to fly. Sort of like kiwis and ostriches, eh?

Prev by Date: Re: Sonorasaurus
Next by Date: Picrodon
Previous by thread: Re: WHAT I SAW TODAY AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
Next by thread: Re: WHAT I SAW TODAY AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
Indexes: