Re: Finally some non-theropod questions (actual question en

["Peter Von Sholly" <vonrex@gte.net>]

Funny you might say that, as my suggestion was a "bront".

----------
> From: Joyce E. Green <JEBGREEN@geode.umnh.utah.edu>
> To: jconrad@lib.drury.edu; dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: Finally some non-theropod questions (actual question en
> Date: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 10:28 AM
> 
> Just an opinion from a lurker -- how about *a thunder of sauropods* ?
> 
> Joyce Green
> Utah Museum of Natural History
> 
> 
> Date sent:      Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:28:35 -0500 (CDT)
> Send reply to:  jconrad@lib.drury.edu
> From:           Jack <jconrad@lib.drury.edu>
> To:             Ralph Miller III <gbabcock@best.com>
> Copies to:      archosaur@usa.net, dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject:        Re: Finally some non-theropod questions (actual question
enclosed)
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Ralph Miller III wrote:
> 
> > camarasaur chicks were not consuming rough plant material.  
> 
> love the usage of "chicks"; what was a group of sauropods called?  brood,
> flock, murder, herd, mob?  I know that it really depends on the social
> structure, but based on what we know, what is the most common way of
> referring to a group?
> 
> Jack