[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: MAMENCHISAUR NECKS

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: MAMENCHISAUR NECKS
From: Bettyc <Bettyc@flyinggoat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 08:08:01 -0700
References: <001b01bdb6a8$1dc5b8a0$338b9cd1@f6rkn>
Reply-to: Bettyc@flying-goat.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

of course here in California we have a sea-going-hippo found occasionally at
Blackhawk and other points in the SF Bay Area.
Now how they know this isn't an ordinary freshwater hippo is beyond me.

-Betty Cunningham

RAY D STANFORD wrote:

> >Is it possible that sauropods were semi-aquatic, leading a life like modern
> >hippos?  If a hippo were found as a fossil, would it be identified as
> living
> >the way it does?
> >

--
           Betty Cunningham
the reply-to in this e-mail is a spam trap
remove the dash in flyinggoat in e-mail replies

References:
- Re: MAMENCHISAUR NECKS
  - From: "RAY D STANFORD" <STARSONG@prodigy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: TETRAPODS, PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY, AND CLEAR DEFINITIONS
Next by Date: Extinctions (was Re: Paradoxically temporal)
Previous by thread: Re: MAMENCHISAUR NECKS
Next by thread: Re: MAMENCHISAUR NECKS
Indexes: