[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
THOUGHTS ON SAUROPOD NECKS
-------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
Message text written by INTERNET:darren.naish@port.ac.uk
"Well, Dale Russell was quoted in the _Science_ article that first
reported _Argentinosaurus_ that he felt that this animal may well
have weighed upwards of 100 tons - it is not just a Lessemism (god
help us if it was). Of course, Brian is very correct in that
virtually all other sauropods - including _Mamenchisaurus_ and most
diplodocids - were considerably less weighty. Current estimates put
these animals between 10 and 35 tons, or thereabouts."
-------------------- End Original Message --------------------
And let's not forget the sadly lost partial vertebra of
_Amphicoelias fragillimus_, which, when restored based on similar
diplodocid vertebrae, would have been much larger (though skinnier and
probably lighter) than even _Argentinosaurus_ verts* -- an average
_Diplodocus_ individual could have walked under the belly of this one
without touching!
*for a schematic comparison, see:
Paul, G.S. 1997. Dinosaur models: the good, the bad, and using them
estimate the mass of dinosaurs, pp.129-154 in Wolberg, D.L., Stump, E., and
Rosenberg, G.D. (eds.) _Dinofest International: Proceedings of a
Symposium Sponsored by Arizona State University_. Philadelphia: Academy
of Natural Sciences.
_,_
____/_\,) .. _
--____-===( _\/ \\/ \-----_---__
/\ ' ^__/>/\____\--------
__________/__\_ ____________________________.//__.//_________
Jerry D. Harris
Fossil Preparation Lab
New Mexico Museum of Natural History
1801 Mountain Rd NW
Albuquerque NM 87104-1375
Phone: (505) 899-2809
Fax: (505) 841-2866
102354.2222@compuserve.com