[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: MORE ON BCF
Puh-leeeease! I am not going to harangue anybody anymore about this silly
toe business. As for BCF, I can only add my own sentiments: BFD. I am
personally sick unto death of hearing a few individuals' long-winded
tirades and counter-tirades on the subject. But knock yourselves
out...that's merely my take on it. Without a fuller picture from the fossil
record, it seems pointless to get too dogmatic about any of this.
----------
> From: Danvarner@aol.com
> To: jwoolf@erinet.com
> Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: MORE ON BCF
> Date: Saturday, July 11, 1998 9:05 AM
>
> In a message dated 98-07-10 20:43:23 EDT, you write:
>
> <<
> I'm not familiar with most of the cases you list, but I did want to add
one
> more data point: a single, suspiciously dromaeosaurish-looking print
from a
> site in New Jersey, which was announced and discussed at DinoFest. >>
>
> I've just sensed a disturbance in the force around Pete Von Sholly. Dan
> Varner.