[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: CERATOPSIAN

To: Stanley Friesen <sarima@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: CERATOPSIAN
From: Jeffrey Martz <martz@holly.ColoState.EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 09:09:48 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <3.0.3.32.19971017182042.006f1a28@popd.netcruiser>
Reply-to: martz@holly.ColoState.EDU
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> Well, there is some indirect evidence.  The more inland sediment series
> tend to lack Triceratops, and to contain Montanaceratops and/or
> Leptoceratps.  If the Triceratops came from upland areas, they should be
> *more* common inland, not less.

     Are these "inland sediments" actually part of the Hell Creek
Formation itself, or are you referring to different Lancian formations like
the Scollard?    

LN Jeff
O-

References:
- Re: CERATOPSIAN
  - From: Stanley Friesen <sarima@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Protoavis?
Next by Date: Re: "Re" in Subject line
Previous by thread: Re: CERATOPSIAN
Next by thread: Re: CERATOPSIAN
Indexes: