[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: T. rex skeletons
Thanks for adding to the "stats". I should have added that this
catalogue is a February l996 copy. Your post has been forwarded.
> Darryl wrote:
>
> At 06:47 PM 17/05/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >This is an abbreviated list provided by the Black Hills Inst. > >of
> >Geological Research, Inc.
> I think there are some areas of this list that I would dispute. If the BHI
> gave this to you, you might want to tell them to update this list.
>
> >No. SPECIMEN YEAR LOCATION AMT. EXHIBITOR
> >
> >1. BM-R7994 1900 Wyoming 13% British Museum, London
>
> The dentaries, dorsals, cervicals, and incomplete pelvis and femur probably
> add up to more than 13% (what a strange number to pick anyway).
>
> >2. CM-9380 1902 Montana 10% Carnegie Museum,
> >Pittsburgh, PA
>
> This specimen is the one on display at the CMNH. The listing I have for it
> in "The complete T. rex" says 50%, but I think that is high. It is partial
> skull, most of the pelvis and hind limbs, right humerus, gastralia, and some
> vertebrae.
>
> >3. AMNH-5027 1906 Montana 45% Amer. Museum of Nat.
> >Hist., New York, NY
>
> This is the most famous of the T. rex specimens. I know that most estimates
> of completeness are at least 60%.
>
> >4. LACM-23844 1966 Montana 25% L.A. County Museum,
> >Los Angeles, CA
>
> There is seventy five percent of the skull and at least 30% of the skeleton
> (again, according to Dr. Horner). For completeness, I have skull (already
> mentioned), cervicals, dorsals, caudals, ribs, gastrailia, shoulder girdle,
> incomplete ischia and femur, fibula, and incomplete metetarsus. This I got
> from Ralph Molnar's 1991 article.
>
> >5. LACM-23845 1966 Montana 12% L.A. County Museum,
> >Los Angeles, CA
> >6. MOR-008 1967 Montana 40% of skull Museum of the
> >Rockies, Bozeman, MT
> >7. SDSM-12047 1980 S. Dakota 25% S.D. Sch. of Mines&
> >Tech., Rapid City, SD
>
> Molnar's numbers are skull + 40% of the skeleton.
>
> >8. TMP.81.12.1 1946 Alberta 20% Royal Tyrrell Museum,
> >Drumheller, ALB
>
> Molnar lists this as much of the skeleton, minus the skull. Dr. Horner
> places it at 30% (hind-limbs, pelvis, and vertebrae from neck to tail). It
> is the skeleton mounted at the RTMP.
>
> >9. TMP.81.6.1 1981 Alberta 25% Royal Tyrrell Museum,
> >Drumheller, ALB
>
> The people I talked to when this toured through my hometown said that the
> latest count was 40%. Everything I read seems to agree.
>
> >10. MOR-009 1981 Montana 15% Museum of the
> >Rockies, Bozeman, MT
> >11. MOR-555 (Wankel)1988 Montana 46% Museum of the
> >Rockies, Bozeman, MT
>
> Everything I have heard places this at 80%+. I have never seen an estimate
> so low. It was fairly complete, missing half the tail, one arm, some skull,
> ribs, and pedal elements.
>
> >12. BHI-2033 (SUE) 1990 S. Dakota 90% Sotheby's Auction
> >House, New York, NY
> >13. BHI-3033 (Stan) 1992 S. Dakota 65% Black Hills Museum of
> >Nat. Hist.,
> Hill City, SD
>
> The website that is promoting the BHI and stan is now listing this skeleton
> at 80%+ as well.
COULD YOU ADVISE THE URL OF THIS SITE?
> >14. DMNH-2827 1992 Colorado 2% Denver Museum of Nat.
> >Hist., Denver, CO
> >15. "Z-rex" 1992 S. Dakota 50% (?) Unknown at this date
>
> The infamous place that Dr. Holtz listed, and had his nuckles wrapped for
> his indiscretion, lists this as 75% complete.
>
> >16. "Bowman" 1993 N. Dakota 10% Bowman, ND
> >17. BHI-4100 (Duffy)1993 S. Dakota 30% (?) Black Hills Museum of
> >Nat.
> Hist., Hill City, SD
> >18. "Scottie" 1994 Saskatchewan 50% (?) Royal Sask. Museum,
> >Regina, SASK.
>
> I spoke recently with someone excavating this skeleton and he told me they
> were now looking at an estimate of 75%.
>
> >19. "U. of Wisc." 1994 Montana 10% Univ. of Wisc.
> >Geology Museum, Madison, WI
> >20. "County rex" 1994 S. Dakota (?) Harding County, SD
> >21. "Steven" 1995 S. Dakota (?) Harding County, SD
> >
> I wish there was a registry somewhere where this information could be
> stored, for all finds. It would also be nice to have a defined way of
> estimating completeness. I think it would solve most of these problems.
>
> Darryl
>
Exactly! kel also responded with a list. Any webmeisters out there
willing to help out?
Gertrude Smith
> Darryl
> "the truth is, I don't really care how the dinosaurs died.
> I'm interested in how they lived." (Dr. John R. Horner,
> from the Complete T.rex, 1993)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> The two most common elements in the universe are
> hydrogen and stupidity.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> dinoguy@interlog.com
> http://www.interlog.com/~dinoguy