[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Reevolving bones?

To: Adam Yates <zooamy@zoo.latrobe.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Reevolving bones?
From: Jeffrey Martz <martz@holly.ColoState.EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 16:38:25 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: Dinogeorge@aol.com, znc14@ttacs1.ttu.edu, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.ULT.3.90.970508112111.26018B-100000@zoom.zoo.latrobe.edu.au>
Reply-to: martz@holly.ColoState.EDU
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> > As neither John nor you seems to understand, reversals >are< a problem, and 
> > a
> > >big< problem.
> that was always there but simply not turned on. We know that modern 
> genomes carry un-expressed instructions, for occasionally a mutation will 
> bring them back into use. 

     Couldn't you just stop the ontongentic development of a feature while
it is in the middle of recapitulation?

LN Jeff
O-

References:
- Re: Reevolving bones?
  - From: Adam Yates <zooamy@zoo.latrobe.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Evolution programs (was: Reevolving bones)
Next by Date: Re: Evolution programs (was: Reevolving bones)
Previous by thread: Re: Reevolving bones?
Next by thread: Re: Reevolving bones?
Indexes: