--- Begin Message ---
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:
>
> Might I add that, having examined this tooth, it is fairly clearly
> tyrannosaurid, and helps to polarize the character "premaxillary tooth
> serrations absent" in my data matrix, lending (very weak) support to the
> monophyly of Aublysodontinae.
>
> (This tooth does possess clear serrations).
Neither do our basal Cenomanian premax teeth (much larger cheek teeth).
Phil Currie suggested referring to them as cf. Alectrosaurus.
Jim K.
--- End Message ---