[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Stegosaur plates as protection......
Mark Sumner wrote:
>
> I find it very difficult to picture a bipedal theropod, it's head a dozen
> feet in the air, attacking the "soft underbelly" of anything. We have good
> evidence from hadrosaur and Triceratops specimens that Tyranosaurs attacked
> the backbone.
That doesn't imply that that is the killing blow. It could have been
a maneuver to turn the animal over. The teeth won't fall out if you
bite into soft tissue. There is still a lot of cost in going through
hard material. Don't read too much into the fossil evidence.
>
> Jurassic theropods were certainly not so top-heavy as a T. rex, but I still
> rather doubt they would have grabbed a Stegosaur by the underside of the
> throat.
I'm not trying to imply they only attacked soft tissue, but that this
was
their ultimate target. The killing blow would be to soft tissue.
I also have no doubt that there were exceptions.
>
> Mark
> ----
> __
> / \ DEVIL'S TOWER http://www.inlink.com/~range
> / \ EXTREME ZONE http://www.simonsays.com/extreme/
> / MI7A \ MERCY IN 7 ACTS coming soon from Devil's Tower Studios
--
**********************
My other job is dictator/kamikaze pilot.
Marc: http://www.cs.ruu.nl/~hansb/d.chessvar/makerule.html