[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Stegosaur plates as protection......



Mark Sumner wrote:
> 
> I find it very difficult to picture a bipedal theropod, it's head a dozen
> feet in the air, attacking the "soft underbelly" of anything.  We have good
> evidence from hadrosaur and Triceratops specimens that Tyranosaurs attacked
> the backbone.

That doesn't imply that that is the killing blow.  It could have been
a maneuver to turn the animal over.  The teeth won't fall out if you
bite into soft tissue.  There is still a lot of cost in going through
hard material.  Don't read too much into the fossil evidence.  

> 
> Jurassic theropods were certainly not so top-heavy as a T. rex, but I still
> rather doubt they would have grabbed a Stegosaur by the underside of the
> throat.

I'm not trying to imply they only attacked soft tissue, but that this
was
their ultimate target.  The killing blow would be to soft tissue.

I also have no doubt that there were exceptions.

> 
> Mark
> ----
>    __
>   /  \   DEVIL'S TOWER http://www.inlink.com/~range
>  /    \  EXTREME ZONE  http://www.simonsays.com/extreme/
> / MI7A \ MERCY IN 7 ACTS coming soon from Devil's Tower Studios

-- 
**********************

My other job is dictator/kamikaze pilot.

Marc: http://www.cs.ruu.nl/~hansb/d.chessvar/makerule.html