[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: no feathers on Pelicanimimus
In a message dated 97-06-13 03:28:06 EDT, longrich@phoenix.Princeton.EDU
(Nick Longrich) writes:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 1997 NJPharris@aol.com wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 97-06-10 12:41:32 EDT, longrich@phoenix.Princeton.EDU
> > (Nick Longrich) writes:
> >
> > > there is some indirect evidence that the common ancestor of
> > > troodonts, dromaeosaurs, and oviraptors did have honest to goodness
> > > avian-style feathers.
> >
> > Of course, this animal would also be the ancestor of tyrannosaurs,
> > ornithomimosaurs, _Unenlagia_, _Archaeopteryx_, alvarezsaurs, true
birds,
> > probably therizinosaurs, and a whole host of beasties no one has ever
> heard
> > of yet!
> >
> > Nick Pharris
> >
> Norell puts Troodon in the Maniraptora.
Yes. This seems to be a residual effect of the (IMHO outmoded) idea that
troodonts and dromaeosaurs form a monophyletic Deinonychosauria.
> Tyrannosaurs and
> Ornithomimids lack some birdlike specializations to arms, legs and tail
> that are shared by the troodontidae with dromaeosaurs, oviraptoridae,
> and alvarezsaurs and so these two would have to have a lot of reversals.
The most significant of these would, I assume, be
1)loss of the semilunate carpal block in a general reduction of the wrist
(semilunate carpal blocks are reportedly present even in allosaurs, so the
lack of this character in any coelurosaur would be a reversal);
2)relengthening of the ischiadic rod;
3)loss of raptorial 2d digit on foot (also in oviraptorosaurs, alvarezsaurs,
modern birds);
I wouldn't call this *a lot* of reversals (I'm not sure what characters in
the tail you're referring to); on the other hand, dromaeosaurs, alvarezsaurs,
and oviraptorids lack many characters shared by troodonts, ornithomimosaurs,
and tyrannosaurs, including arctomet feet and D-sectioned premaxillary teeth,
which I count as carrying more weight.
> -Nick L.
-Nick P.