[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Warm-blooded debate

To: dwlewis@rmii.com
Subject: Re: Warm-blooded debate
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 02:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: j-dyal@geocities.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 97-07-10 01:35:47 EDT, dwlewis@rmii.com (Douglas W. Lewis)
writes:

<<  WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
                                     Caleb >>

Sorry, but >you're< wrong. No matter how many exclamation marks you use, your
case is hopeless.

Well--what were they? Endothermic or ectothermic, or mixed? How do you know?
Did you >directly< measure their body temperatures? That's the ONLY
acceptable evidence. >Everything< else is supposition, hypothesis,
speculation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Warm-blooded debate
  - From: zenlizard@juno.com (Sam j hogan)
- Re: Warm-blooded debate
  - From: "Douglas W. Lewis" <dwlewis@rmii.com>

Prev by Date: What do you have on your monitor
Next by Date: GLUT BOOK
Previous by thread: Re: Warm-Blooded debate
Next by thread: Re: Warm-blooded debate
Indexes: