Re: Origin of Birds

[Jonathon Woolf <jwoolf@erinet.com>]

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. wrote:

> (Feduccia and Martin have both published on the fact that they "know"
> cladistic analytical methodology MUST be wrong, because it keeps on putting
> birds within the coelurosaur dinosaurs, even when different peoples
> different data sets are used...)

Did I read that right?  Feduccia and Martin dismiss cladistic analysis
out-of-hand, simply because it conflicts with their assumptions about
bird origins?

-- JSW