[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Big = Old = Advanced?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Big = Old = Advanced?
From: garrison@efn.org (Garrison Hilliard)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:36:36 GMT
In-reply-to: <Pine..3.94.970820135250.17942B-100000@shell>
References: <Pine..3.94.970820135250.17942B-100000@shell>
Reply-to: garrison@efn.org
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On 20 Aug 97 14:16:00 EDT, you wrote:


>Offhand, I can't think of any "big-animal" group that comes from
>big-animals.  (Hadrosaurs?) If this is actually the case, it
>has some interesting consequences.  Among other things, it would suggest
>that once all members of a group were Living Large, the future diversity
>of that group was limited.

Crocodilians excluded?

"You're dirty, sweet, with a hubcap diamond-star halo... she's dirty, sweet, 
and she's my girl" - T. Rex

References:
- Big = Old = Advanced?
  - From: Mark Sumner <range@inlink.com>

Prev by Date: The Biggest Dinosaurs
Next by Date: A Neander Meander
Previous by thread: Big = Old = Advanced?
Next by thread: Re: The Biggest Dinosaurs
Indexes: