[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: What's in a Name (Was: RAPTOR WRONG)

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: What's in a Name (Was: RAPTOR WRONG)
From: dunn1@IDT.NET
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 22:27:42 +0000
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.970812200926.31876B-100000@holmes.umd.edu>
References: <v01530500b014d54f2e60@[204.213.188.74]>
Reply-to: dunn1@IDT.NET
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> From:          Amado Narvaez <anarvaez@umd5.umd.edu>

> I doubt that there will be any serious damage caused by the public's
> misunderstanding of the word. Kids who get hooked on dinosaurs from
> watching JP/LW will eventually learn the difference. Remember the sauropod
> coming out of the swamp and devouring the guy in "King Kong"? 

Hey, sauropods need a little protein now and then too. 

Larry
"Madam, I'm Adam."

References:
- RAPTOR WRONG (LONG)
  - From: franczak@ntplx.net (Brian Franczak)
- What's in a Name (Was: RAPTOR WRONG)
  - From: Amado Narvaez <anarvaez@umd5.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: work experience
Next by Date: Dinosaur Hand Shakes
Previous by thread: What's in a Name (Was: RAPTOR WRONG)
Next by thread: The Science of Jurassic Park and the Lost World
Indexes: