ICZN rules?

[tlford@ix.netcom.com (Tracy Ford)]

I just got a package from an aquantince of mine. He's suppose to be 
working with Welles and Powell on theropods. Last I heard the 
Welles/Powell megalosaur monograph was dead in the water (I talked to a 
student of Powell's a few years ago, and she said that Welles portion 
was done, but Powell had no desire to do anything with it. It seems to 
me Welles is a splitter and Powell is a lumper!)

Anyway what he does is name new genera. From what I understand he says 
Carpenter's 1991 Maleevosaurus is invalid, actually I can't even see it 
in his list, because he Pickering named it in 1984. But the only thing 
he did was have his paper Copyrighted in 1984. 

What I want to know (I know where George stands on this) is a 
copyrighted paper valid in the eyes of the ICZN? I don't know if these 
papers, saurischian monograph, will ever be published for the general 
public.

I'd like to contact Welles and Powell just to see if they're actually 
doing it with him.

Tracy