[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Bipedal apatosaurs and stegosaurs?
Nick Longrich wrote (quoting Robert J Meyerson):
> > All this would use up a lot of energy. It would be far more
> > efficient to stay on the ground and feed on what is readily
> > available, then move to the next tree (especially in a pine forest)
>
> The real problem with this is that it is not anatomically
> possible. As has been pointed out, diplodocid necks at best stick
> straight out, the Dicraeosaurus illustration I looked at actually
> had it pointed *down* slightly. Diplodocids would make absurdly bad
> giraffe-style browsers because of the downard direction of the neck
> and short forelegs that only compound the problem. Either they
> grazed, or they reared.
Exactly. Another point I'd like to make, that I tried to make in an
earlier post, is that it is absolutely not space efficient in a
semi-dense to dense forest to be a Diplodocoid walking around on all
fours. Here's a crude diagram as seen from above: (It will only work
if you have an equal-area font though)
Diplodocus on all fours: Brachiosaur: Rearing Diplodocus:
****** ******* ********
*TREE* **TREE** *TREE*
**** ****** ****
** A ** A A
TREE | TREE | |
** | ** _|_ ** | **
| ** / | \ TREE _|_ TREE
| TREE | | ** / | \ **
| ** | | | |
| | | | |
| \ / \ /
* _|_ \ / \ /
/ \ ** | |
| | TREE | ** |
| | ** | TREE |
| | | ** |
| | |
\ / ** |
\ / TREE |
| **
| et cetera on the tail...
Whereas the "A" is the head of the sauropod and they are all about equal in
size. This shows that a rearing Diplodocoid would be much more compact than
one on all fours, and thus much more manoeuverable in a forest than basically
a 90' beam. It would be nearly impossible for a Diplodocoid to move sideways
in a forest if it was on all fours, so the only viable option in a forest was
to them to have reared and walked bipedally.
Peter Buchholz
gpb6845@msu.oscs.montana.edu
Los Angeles loves love