[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: No aquatic dinos? (was Re: No dinosaurs in Quebec, Canada?)

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: No aquatic dinos? (was Re: No dinosaurs in Quebec, Canada?)
From: Stan Friesen <swf@ElSegundoCA.NCR.COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 15:40:43 -0500 (EST)
Reply-to: swf@ElSegundoCA.NCR.COM
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

 From: "Tim Williams" <T.Williams@cclru.randwick.unsw.edu.au>

 > The description of _Kollikodon_, a beaver-sized monotreme from the
 > Early Cretaceous of eastern Australia, suggested that it may have
 > been an aquatic mammal; ...

Interesting.  What is the taphonomy and stratigraphy of the find
location?  This might help decide if it was aquatic or not.

swf@elsegundoca.ncr.com         sarima@ix.netcom.com

The peace of God be with you.

Prev by Date: Cladistic Stuff [Part 2]
Next by Date: Re: So long and thanks for all the eggs
Previous by thread: No aquatic dinos? (was Re: No dinosaurs in Quebec, Canada?)
Next by thread: Re: No aquatic dinos? (was Re: No dinosaurs in Quebec, Canada?)
Indexes: