In a message dated 96-01-09 21:04:29 EST, pharrinj@PLU.edu writes: >Revised theropod phylogeny, based on the work of Sereno, with suggestions >and elaborations by Pharris ;-) and Holtz (Dinogeorge, you're not going >to like this much): Sheesh! You're a worse splitter than I am. Some of those families are based on really poorly known genera...