Re: missing a point

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 96-02-07 16:21:44 EST, nking.ucs@smtp.usi.edu (King, Norm)
writes:

>I don't know about the rest of you, but I hurridly wrote my previous 
>posting out, because I have lots of other stuff to do.  When people take 
>the trouble to respond to something I posted and a reply seems 
>appropriate, I feel I should.  Yes, of course, GO is correct, and I could 
>see how the rule would be applied as soon as he reminded me a couple of 
>days ago.  I know there are no such genera.  Good lord, is this all you 
>guys do?

My apologies for being so picky. Force of habit.