[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Fighting dinosaurs
[ My gut reaction to the following was to send it only to Tracy, but
upon reflection and counsel from a disinterested other party, I've
decided to allow it with this caveat: If you want to respond to
this message either make your response specifically relevant to
dinosaurs (e.g. tell Joe something about the articulation of the
specimens whose taphonomy he's questioning), or send your response
someplace else (e.g. to Joe directly). -- MR ]
Tracy Ford wrote:
> Joe Daniel wrote:
>
> >Does it strike anyone as a little strange that, even if these two
> >animals were suddenly covered in sand, that they would be suddenly
> >frozen in that position or would continue fighting each other for
> >their last moments? Surely the last thought of both of them was
> >getting out of the sand. I would tend to think that that foot found
> >its way to its final resting place not as an act of aggression but
> >simply trying to find a foothold to get itself to air and escape.
> >This of course means that any discussion of fighting tactics based
> >on the burial positions is somewhat meaningless, isn't it? Surely
> >someone else has thought of this so what am I missing?
>
> Oh, please not again. Why, oh why do people keep questioning what the
> experts say?
>
> THEY WERE FIGHTING. Many eperts have studied it, they DIED that way. I
> just ran across a nice Japanese Dino book that has good color view's of
> the two, and they died that way.
>
> Tracy
>
> [ FWIW, I'd rewrite the second question, Tracy; there's always reason
> to question the "experts". However, I would concur that people
> sometimes ought to pay a bit more respect to those who have actually
> examined the evidence first hand... -- MR ]
Why do people keep questioning the experts? Let me remind you of how
science is done, if I may be so brash. First off, practically
everything we know has come from questioning the supposed experts. If
we didn't we would all still believe that the sun revolved around the
earth and we would be living in grass and mud huts. The experts got
that way by questioning the world around them and by not taking
everything as gospel. In all due respect to the experts, they are
sometimes wrong. Or should we just take everyone who questions
authority out back and shoot them? Oops, there goes Darwin, Einstein,
Galileo, and EVERY OTHER FAMOUS SCIENTIST. Of my own experience, the
papers and seminars I did in college that got the most lauded response
from my professors were those in which I presented good arguments
against a published paper by an acknowledged "expert." Of course it
helps when you can include the published opinions of other experts that
support your stance :) This also points out one other thing: there are
very few instances in which ALL the experts agree. Nothing is certain
in science, there is always room for questions and reinterpretations.
The scientist that falls so in love with his theories that he can't bear
the thought of someone questioning them is in the wrong field. Also,
those who follow the experts on blind faith are bound to feel
disappointed and betrayed by them when the newer truth is revealed.
Oh, and by the way, please reread my last sentence. To remind people,
it ends with "what am I missing?" I never said I had the final say, I
never said I knew without looking at the fossils that everyone else was
wrong and I was handing down a judgement from one high. I simply stated
something that on the surface looked logically wrong and wondered if
anyone could give me insight into how this might happen. Your comments
were neither helpful nor appropriate IMHO. If anyone does have some
helpful comments and can help explain this to me by all means respond, I
would be interested in hearing from you. I do not follow anyone on
blind faith but I recognize that those who are working in the field know
a hell of a lot more about it than I do, which is why I signed onto this
group in the first place, so I could learn from the comments given by
other contributors, the great majority of whom are clearly intelligent
and knowledgable about the subject.
Joe (not the ultimate guru but trying his best to understand) Daniel