[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: More news about Sue
>
> The following quotes were sent to me by Ken Carpenter:
>
> "When an object is of particularly high scientific importance, it is
> my belief that its preservation must be guaranteed by some legally
> enforceable means." Editorial by Kevin Schiefer, US Attorney for
> South Dakota, Rapid City Journal May 23, 1992
>
> "Murdy [of the BIA] said his understanding of the situation is that
> the government's trust status responsibility is to Willams - not to
> any scientific standard. The government hopes to get Williams the
> best value for the dinosaur, but that value is hard to determine."
> Hill City Prevaile, Sept. 6, 1995
>
> I don't know anything more than what's there, but look carefully at
> the dates above. Things don't look that promising for Sue's long-term
> disposition.
>
I've got a solution to this problem....
Make "Sue" ward of the United States and send it to the AMNH....or at
least allow the specimen to be examined by paleontologist or a team of
paleontologists from all over the U.S.
There is just too much information to be had from this specimen to be let
setting under wraps
---John Schneiderman (dino@revelation.unomaha,edu)