Re: Dinosaur fiction is more real than fact

["Terry Colvin" <colvint@FHU.DISA.MIL>]

There is a geological principle , which can be applied in many 
circumstances" Absence of evidence , is not evidence of absence ", 
just because something hasn`t been found , doesn`t mean that it never 
existed in the first place. 
Jurassic Park , the film was also a rare example of a film being more 
correct than the book , e.g. , Stegosaurii in the book , have cheek 
pouches (like a squirrel), when all of the specimens that have been 
found TO DATE do not , again , this does not mean that they didn`t 
haver them , but on the balance of evidence , the film wins , with no 
cheek pouches in sight .