[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sauropod Reference

To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Sauropod Reference
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1995 22:49:53 -0400
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu

In a message dated 95-10-22 22:30:44 EDT, zooamy@zoo.latrobe.edu.au (Adam
Yates) writes:

>Upchurch, P. 1995. The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs. Phil. 
>Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 349, 365-390.
>
>

I've been looking forward to this one for a while. I can't imagine
_Opisthocoelicaudia_ as being closely related to titanosaurids at
all--opisthocoelous caudals versus procoelous caudals, bifid neural spines
versus single neural spines, et al. I'll have to see a very powerful case
against these basic features.

Prev by Date: Re: FEATHERS AND POSTURE.....
Next by Date: Re: Sauropod Reference
Previous by thread: Sauropod Reference
Next by thread: Re: Sauropod Reference
Indexes: